June 2019

Permian consolidation will likely follow precedent of more mature basins

Upcoming events:

URTeC 2019

Our experts will be in Denver, Colorado July 22-24 for the conference. Join us in booth #1335 to meet our experts, explore our products with live demonstrations and workflow examples, and use one of our screens to evaluate market trends. Learn more and see our Technical Program slots.

Annual Summits

We are pleased to announce the dates for our Annual Summits. The agenda for each location is still being finalized but save the date in your calendar now. 

Houston: September 11-12
London: September 24-25
Singapore: October 8-9

Article: Permian natural gas flaring and venting reaching all-time high

Article: Just 10% of shale oil companies are cash flow positive


Shale Upstream Analytics: Monthly reports with insights into key trends and developments in the North American tight oil and shale gas plays, including an overview of M&A activity, productivity metrics, short- and medium-term projections on production, spending, and valuation.

ShaleWellCube: Database with daily updates of official well data for the US, Canada and Argentina, covering over ~1,500,000 wells and permitsIt contains a detailed analysis of well curves, pad drilling, re-frack trends and well economics. A powerful tool that gives an in-depth insight into North American shale and conventional well activities.

Shale IntelReport with unique insights into supply and demand of key service segments of the US shale industry. Provides an industry overview of drivers behind drilling and completions activity, detailed analysis and forecast of the global frac services market, the US frac sand market overview, analysis of the US oilfield water management market as well as an overview of the US stimulation chemicals market.


Newsletter Subscription: If you are not yet a subscriber to this email or you would like to receive one of our other industry newsletters, please fill out the Newsletter Subscription Form.

The consolidation process in the Permian Basin is underway, echoing the evolution of many mature basins that came before it. Taking a closer look at these historical examples can provide clues that hint at the possible implications a number of active operators in the Permian may face as the basin continues to consolidate.

Figure 1 shows the number of active operators in the Midland and Delaware basins, along with the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Marcellus and Utica plays. Within this analysis, Rystad Energy considers an operator as active if it has completed at least one horizontal unconventional (fracked) well in the given year. The tallies are based on Rystad Energy’s standard company names, which account for both historical M&A activity and different legal entities of the same company.

From 2009 to 2014 both the Bakken and Eagle Ford went through periods of increased interest in the exploration of unconventional resources. The number of operators grew substantially, peaking at 75 players in Eagle Ford in 2014 and 52 companies in Bakken in 2012. These numbers dropped sharply from 2015 to 2016, sliding by between 30% and 50% during this period of low oil prices – a trend driven both by the process of consolidation and by paused activity at these mature basins. Some operators resumed development in Bakken and Eagle Ford during 2017 and 2018, resulting in the number of active players increasing again. Yet, the number of operators active in these basins has not fully recovered to the levels seen in 2012 to 2014, suggesting that the consolidation process carved out 15% to 35% of unique company names.

Marcellus reached its peak in terms of the number of active operators in 2011, earlier than its peers. Since that time it has seen a reduction of around 40% in the number of active companies. Utica Shale attracted as many as 26 different E&Ps at peak in 2014, but recent M&A activity took the active operator count down to 19 or 20 names.

In turn, the Permian Basin is showing the first signs of an inflection point in terms of the number of active players. The active operator count declined marginally last year on the Midland side of the basin, but Delaware still saw an increase of about 20%, with many new private company names appearing in the operator list. We expect that it will take more time to see material reductions in the number of active operators in the Permian, as total resource potential in the basin is likely much larger than in other basins. The primary reason for this is because any reductions in the operator count that occur through M&A activity can often be easily offset by continuous injections of small E&Ps backed by private equity.

Figure 1: A graph showing the number of active* operators by year and basin in number of companies from 2009 to 2018. Source: Rystad Energy ShaleWellCube, June 2019

Looking at the share of the top 10 operators in terms of basin-wide horizontal completion activity last year helps to understand where the Permian currently stands within its consolidation curve. In Delaware, the top 10 operators account for just half of the total completions in the basin, illustrating the significant contribution from smaller operators. Midland is a bit more similar to mature basins, with 61% of completions driven by the top 10 operators. In Appalachia, meanwhile, the top 10 operators contribute the most in terms of basin-wide horizontal completion activity, as the largest operators in both Marcellus and Utica account for around 80% of activity.

A bar chart showing the share of top 10 operations in horizontal completions in 2018 in percent. Source: Rystad Energy ShaleWellCube, June 2019

The magnitude of the consolidation process in some mature basins looks even more dramatic when accounting for historical, rather than current, operatorship using our standard names (although our conclusions are not much affected by the difference). Figure 3 shows active operator counts by spud year for Bakken Shale in North Dakota with the use of historical operator names. This shows that if we consider the original operator names (including all currently non-existent legal entities), the active operator count in Bakken ND peaked at 61 companies in 2010 and bottomed out at 28 in 2016. This corresponds to a reduction of approximately 55%. In turn, when using our current standard names, we see a peak-to-trough reduction of 49% between 2011 and 2016. Similar slight changes in the magnitude of operator count reduction can be observed for other mature unconventional basins.

Figure 3: A graph showing the number of active* operators by year in Bakken, ND. Source: Rystad Energy ShaleWellCube, June 2019