Bolivia’s hydrocarbons sector began the 21st century from a position of strength. Major discoveries, steady foreign investment, and robust exports underpinned national development. However, the 2006 nationalization fundamentally changed sector dynamics. While the state captured a larger share of revenues, the policy environment gradually discouraged upstream investment. Exploration waned, reserves declined, and production began to fall just as regional markets became more competitive. Bolivia still has meaningful geological potential, but capital and capabilities must return if that potential is to materialize.

Bolivia’s contemporary export picture is starkly different from what it was even a decade ago. Brazil is now effectively Bolivia’s only significant market for natural gas. Although a long-term gas supply contract with Brazil expired in 2019, Bolivia continues to export under shorter-term arrangements, leveraging existing pipeline infrastructure and long-standing commercial ties. Brazil’s fundamentals remain favorable: industrial gas demand continues to expand, thermal generation remains important for grid stability, and the liberalization of the Brazilian gas market is encouraging new entrants who increasingly value pipeline gas as a flexible complement to liquefied natural gas.

However, Brazil’s appetite for Bolivian gas is tempered by concerns about supply reliability. Declining Bolivian production has resulted in delivery shortfalls, forcing Brazilian buyers to diversify. This creates an opportunity for competitors, and Argentina is the most prominent among them.

Argentina, once Bolivia’s second major export destination, no longer represents a real market. The ramp-up of Vaca Muerta shale production, combined with investments in transport infrastructure, has allowed Argentina to sharply reduce imports from Bolivia. In fact, Argentina is now positioning itself as a future exporter to Brazil, particularly during high-demand seasons. This development has strategic consequences: Bolivia now faces a region where it must compete, rather than one where geography alone guaranteed its relevance.

For Bolivia to secure and expand its remaining export foothold in Brazil, the country must present itself as a dependable, long-term supplier supported by clear policy direction and credible investment plans.

YPFB will play a decisive role in shaping this trajectory. The state company remains central to Bolivia’s hydrocarbons ecosystem, but to catalyze a meaningful sector revival it must operate more commercially, streamline decision-making, and partner more effectively with international oil companies and private firms. YPFB’s future relevance depends on facilitating new exploration rather than attempting to manage all upstream activities internally. Joint ventures, transparent contracting frameworks, and more agile project execution will be essential.

For its part, the new Bolivian government must re-establish predictability, both in fiscal terms and in regulatory governance. Investors will respond not to political messaging but to clarity, consistency, and the visible alignment of institutions around medium- and long-term development priorities.

President Paz takes office at a moment when Bolivia’s hydrocarbons sector faces real risks, but also a genuine opportunity to reset. If policy conditions improve and capital returns, Bolivia can strengthen its role as a strategic gas supplier to Brazil even amid rising competition from Argentina. With pragmatic reforms, institutional stability, and a more commercially oriented YPFB, Bolivia has a pathway to regain relevance in the regional gas sector and spark a long-needed upstream renaissance.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or beliefs of Rystad Energy. 

Interested in learning more about our capabilities for National Oil Companies? Explore our services here.